«Black holes» in public administration and concept of risk-oriented public administration

Igor Ponkin

doi:10.12737/12070

«BLACK HOLES» IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AND CONCEPT OF RISK-ORIENTED PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION «Black holes» in public administration and concept of risk-oriented public administration

АА Аа

Published in Advances in Law Studies · Volume 3, Issue 3 · Pages 135–141 · Rubric: Administrative law; administrative process

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/12070

Received: 08.07.2015 Accepted: 08.07.2015 Published: 08.07.2015 Language of publication: RUS

Authors

Igor Ponkin

ABSTRACT

Article is devoted questions of the content and nature of risks in the sphere of public administration. The authors define the terms «risk», «risk-oriented public administration». The article shows that the risks in public administration are an integral component of the public administration; risks are given objective reality, which is subject to due consideration. These risks are a consequence of the existence and sufficient entropy updating uncertainties and other of risk-taking determinants in modern processes. The article describes the integrated methods of operating by the field of risk and risk-taking determinants. The article describes the reasons for the low efficiency of operating by risks in public administration.

KEYWORDS

public administration, public law, system of public administration, risk, risks in the sphere of public administration, risk-oriented public administration, administrative law, public administration general theory

Text

Разумный риск — самая похвальная сторона человеческого благоразумия.
Джордж Савил Галифакс (1633–1695)

Любая управленческая деятельность в определенной мере имеет рисковый характер, и это, по мнению Э.А. Уткина и Д.А. Фролова, обусловлено многофакторной динамикой управления и его внешнего окружения, а также ролью человеческого фактора в процессе воздействия. Понятие «риск» имеет многосложную природу, выявить которую возможно лишь во взаимосвязи с такими понятиями, как «неопределенность», «вероятность», «условия риска» и др. [1, с. 3]
Риски в огромном множестве сопряжены с публичным управлением.
Согласно нашему подходу, риск в публичном управлении (как феномен) — это феномен, характеризуемый неопределенностью (неопределенностями) исхода приложения управленческих воздействий в рамках публичного управления и наличием определенной реальной вероятности наступления существенных негативных последствий для процесса и прежде всего для результатов публичного управления (промежуточно этапных, инструментальных реперных или конечных), а также для всей системы публичного управления и государства в целом, включая восприятие и оценку населением легитимности власти. Риск в публичном управлении (как вероятность) — вероятность наступления неблагоприятных для процесса и результатов публичного управления событий или неблагоприятных последствий, ошибок и в целом дефектов публичного управления.

1. Utkin E.A., Frolov D.A. Upravlenie riskami predpriyatiya [Enterprise risk management]. Moscow: TEIS, 2003. 247 p.

2. Directive № 2007/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on the assessment and management of flood risks. URL: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32007L0060.

3. Winston C. Government Failure versus Market Failure: Microeconomics Policy Research and Government Performance. Washington, D.C.: AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies, 2006. 130 p.

4. Krieger K. Norms, structures, procedures and variety in risk-based governance: the case of flood management in Germany and England. Jerusalem Papers in Regulation & Governance (Working Paper), 2012, no 47. 33p.

5. Rothstein H., Borraz O., Huber M. Risk and the limits of governance: Exploring varied patterns of risk-based governance across Europe. Regulation & Governance, 2013, no7, p. 215-235.

6. Risk and regulatory policy: improving the governance of risk (OECD Reviews of Regulatory Reform) / Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://www.planejamento.gov.br/secretarias/upload/Arquivos/seges/arquivos/OCDE2011/OECD_Risk.pdf.2010. 247 p.

7. Becher E.C., Chassin M.R. Improving Quality, Minimizing Error: Making It Happen. Health Affairs, 2001, vol. 20, no 3, p. 68-81.

8. Ponkina A.A. Vrachebnaya oshibka v kontekste zashchity prav patsiyentov [Medical error in the context of patient rights] / The Department of legal support of state and municipal institutions service of Russian Academy of National Economy. Moscow, Consortium of specialists on the protection of patients´ rights, 2012. 200 p.

9. Rothstein H., Borraz O., Huber M. Risk and the limits of governance: Exploring varied patterns of risk-based governance across Europe. Regulation & Governance, 2013, no 7, p. 215-235.

10. Rothstein H., Downer J. «Renewing Defra»: exploring the emergence of risk-based policymaking in UK central government. Public Administration, 2012, vol. 90, no3, p.781-799.

11. Hubbard R., Paquet G. The black Hole of Public Administration. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, 2010. 537 p.

12. Lapina M.A. Theoretical and legal aspects of risk management. Gosudarstvo i pravo [State and law], 2015, no 2, p. 35-44.

This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International

JATS XML

Editor in chief

Grigoriy Starodubtsyev

dexter77@list.ru

Chief editor, Member of the editorial council

Konstantin Sigalov

sigalovconst@mail.ru

Publishing editor

Anna Garashko

garashkoanna@rambler.ru +7(926)583-11-90

This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Creative Commons

GOST

Ponkin I. «Black holes» in public administration and concept of risk-oriented public administration // Advances in Law Studies. 2015. no. 3. pp. 135-141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/12070. (Date of access 24.09.2026).

MLA

Igor Ponkin. "«Black holes» in public administration and concept of risk-oriented public administration." Advances in Law Studies 3.3 (2015): 135-141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/12070.

APA

Ponkin I. (2015). «Black holes» in public administration and concept of risk-oriented public administration. Advances in Law Studies, 3(3), 135-141. https://doi.org/10.12737/12070

Chicago

Igor Ponkin. "«Black holes» in public administration and concept of risk-oriented public administration." Advances in Law Studies 3, no. 3 (2015): 135-141. https://doi.org/10.12737/12070.

WIKI

{{cite journal | author = Ponkin I. | title = «Black holes» in public administration and concept of risk-oriented public administration | journal = Advances in Law Studies | year = 2015 | volume = 3 | issue = 3 | pages = 135-141 | doi = 10.12737/12070 }}

Copy

Export: BibTeX EndNote RefMan RusMARC

«BLACK HOLES» IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AND CONCEPT OF RISK-ORIENTED PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION «Black holes» in public administration and concept of risk-oriented public administration

Confirmation